Journal: Biology Open
Article Title: Apoptosis is a generator of Wnt-dependent regeneration and homeostatic cell renewal in the ascidian Ciona
doi: 10.1242/bio.058526
Figure Lengend Snippet: Pharmacological screen and siRNA effects on oral siphon regeneration. (A) Bar graphs showing the effects of signaling system inhibitors on percent oral siphon regeneration. Percent oral siphon regeneration was determined with respect to controls treated with DMSO. The inhibitors and affected signaling systems are shown at the top of the bars. The numbers of animals assayed are shown at the bottom of the bars. Black asterisks indicate significant differences at P <0.001 between the control and inhibitor treated animals. Red asterisk indicates significant difference at P <0.01. Statistics by χ 2 test and post-hoc Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction. (B–J) Effects of siRNA on oral siphon regeneration. (B,C,E,H) Normal regeneration after treatment with (B) ma3 siRNA, (C) scrambled delta1 siRNA, (E) scrambled ß-catenin siRNA, or (H) scrambled wnt3 siRNA. (D,F,G,I) Suppression of regeneration after treatment with (D) delta1 siRNA, (F) ß-catenin siRNA, (G) ß-catenin siRNA and Wnt3a, or (I) wnt3 siRNA. (J) Rescue of regeneration after treatment with wnt3 siRNA and Wnt3a. Arrows: oral siphon pigmented organs. (K) RT-PCR showing delta1 , ß-catenin , and wtn3 mRNA expression at 6 days post-amputation without corresponding siRNA (-siRNA) and with corresponding siRNA (+siRNA) and notch expression without wnt3 siRNA (−siRNA) and with wnt3 siRNA (+ wnt3 siRNA). (L) Bar graphs showing the effects of siRNA on percent oral siphon regeneration and rescue by exogenous Wnt3a. The number of animals used in each experiment is shown at the bottom of the bars. Black asterisks indicate significant differences at P <0.001 between the respective scrambled controls and the corresponding siRNA treated animals. Red asterisk indicates significant difference at P <0.01. Statistics by χ 2 test and post-hoc Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction. Each experiment was replicated at least two times.
Article Snippet: The FGF signaling pathway inhibitor was SU5402 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) (5 μM) , the Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitors were cyclopamine (Tocris Bioscience) (20 μM) ( ) and Sant-1 (Tocris Bioscience) (15 μM) , the BMP signaling pathway inhibitor was dorsomorphin (Tocris Bioscience) (5 μM) , the Notch signaling pathway inhibitors were DAPT (Tocris Bioscience) (12 μM) ( ) and Compound E (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) (1 μM) , and the Wnt pathway signaling inhibitors were FH535 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) (1.2 μM) ( ) and IWR-1-Endo (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (2.5 μM) ( ).
Techniques: Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing